Submission

Submissions will be made using the easyacademia.org submission system. Before you start the submission process, please read through the submission guidelines below.

Submission is OPEN

The submission deadline is set for February 14, 2025

Important: Options you select or information you input in the submission steps are only temporarily saved, please visit the final Summary step and submit otherwise the information may be lost. You can always visit back later and update your submission if required. For questions regarding the submission process please contact EasyConferences at support@easyconferences.org

Abstract submission guidelines

1. General information

Abstracts must be submitted to ONE of the topic tracks that are offered. Submitting authors are requested to check the entire list of tracks carefully to ensure they submit to the most appropriate track.

The EHPS has a formal affiliation with the United Nations and works to support sustainable development, as well as implement health psychology to improve health around the globe. We ask you to select to which UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) your work is related to or could contribute to. Please select up to two SDGs that best connect to the topic of the abstract you are submitting. We also ask you to connect your work to an EHPS Special Interest Group (SIG), if there is such a connection.

Each track will be chaired by two track chairs appointed by the Scientific Committee. The track chairs will assess the submissions within their tracks. The Scientific Committee has the final decision on the inclusion of abstracts and on the final presentation format.

2. How are abstracts assessed for inclusion in the scientific program?

The abstract content should be explicitly linked to at least one aspect of health psychology
The abstract content must be received on time and presented in the appropriate format, e.g., it must not exceed the word limit (details below).
The abstract should not report research that has been published as an article at the time of submission or research presented at previous EHPS Psychology conferences.
The study must have followed the standards of ethics in research with human beings and/or animals that apply and have obtained appropriate ethical approval (if an intervention study).
Submissions of primary and secondary empirical research must include analyses and a summary of findings, unless submitted as a work-in-progress poster, see later guidance.
English language and grammar should be satisfactory, spelling should be consistent.

Submissions of good quality meeting these criteria will be accepted for inclusion in the scientific program.

The most common reasons for rejecting abstracts are:

Incomplete or insufficiently reported results in the abstract of submissions containing primary research (exception: work-of-progress posters)
Did not include theories or applications directly relevant to the discipline of health psychology.
The guidelines on abstract submission were not adhered to.
The abstract arrived after the deadline for submission.
The number of presentations allowed for the presenting author was exceeded.

3. Oral contributions can be submitted in the following formats:

Standard oral presentation, 12 minutes talk + 3 minutes Q&A

Short oral presentations: concentrated oral presentations with a focus on key findings and their implications, with 7 minutes talk + 3 minutes Q&A

E

a) open to all delegates

E
b) early career researcher presenters only (“spotlight talks”), with a discussant allocated by the CREATE committee.
State-of-the-art presentation, 35 minutes + 10 minutes Q&A
Symposium, with 4-5 presentations (12+3 minutes) and 1-2 interactive elements (e.g., discussion, activity) in a 90 minutes slot
Roundtable/debate/showcase, 60 minutes

Guidelines for each format are presented below. The maximum number of contributions for presenters, including posters, is one. Being a chair, discussant (e.g., for a symposium or roundtable), or presenting in a roundtable/debate/showcase does not count as an oral presentation. There is no limit on the number of non-presenting co-author contributions.

Please note that presenting authors of accepted abstracts must register and pay the conference registration fee (in-person or online) by the deadline for pre-conference online registration.
The abstracts of authors who fail to do so will be removed from the program.

4. Submission options and abstract formats

When submitting an abstract, the preferred type of presentation should be chosen from the options below, and the appropriate abstract format guidelines followed:

STANDARD and short oral presentations and spotlight presentations

State-of-the-art Presentations

Symposium

Roundtable / debate / showcase

Poster presentations

Workshops

RECORDED ORAL AND VIRTUAL POSTERS PRESENTATIONS

STANDARD and short oral presentations and spotlight presentations

Standard oral presentations will last for a total of 15 minutes, with 12 minutes presentation time and 3 minutes for audience questions. They typically describe original empirical primary or secondary research. They can also include “important replications” (please state in the abstract what this study is replicating and why this is important) or describe “lessons learned” from problems and pitfalls in specific research projects.

Short oral presentations will last for a total of 10 minutes, with 7 minutes presentation time and 3 minutes for audience questions. They should focus on the description of findings and implications, giving only the context (background and methods) necessary to understand the results.

Spotlight talks will last for a total of 10 minutes, with 7 minutes presentation time and 3 minutes for audience questions. Submissions are open to early career researcher presenters only. They will be grouped in sessions and allocated a senior researcher discussant by the CREATE committee. To submit a spotlight talk, please select “Early Career Researcher (ECR) Spotlight Talks” as the track.

Abstracts for standard and short oral presentations and for the spotlight talks should include:

Title: 15 words or fewer (use upper-case letters only for the first word and names).

Author(s) details (name and affiliation): First name(s) followed by surname(s); Institution of affiliation, country. The first author is the presenting author.

The body of the text should be no longer than 250 words and include:

Background: State the primary objectives of the study, including the main research questions, aims or theory being tested.

Methods: Quantitative studies should include design, participants (including number of participants), measures, and analysis. Qualitative studies should include design, participants, and methods of data collection and analysis, e.g., thematic analysis, discourse analysis, and interpretative phenomenological analysis.

Findings: Quantitative studies should include a summary of the results (accompanied by important statistical information). Qualitative studies should include a description of the main findings such as the themes or categories generated. An abstract for work-in-progress should include a detailed description of the planned analyses.

Discussion: Conclusions and/or some discussion of the possible contribution to, or implications for, health psychology, SIG’s activity, and other relevant contexts.

Please do not include (a list of) references in the body or at the end of your abstract.

State-of-the-art Presentations

State-of-the-art presentations allow researchers to present particularly novel or highly impactful or cutting-edge research in health psychology. Only a limited number of state-of-the-art presentations, which are allocated a 45-minute slot (35-minute presentation + up to 10 minutes Q&A), will be included in the conference program. If you wish to give a state-of-the-art presentation, please submit in one document a 300-word abstract and a short statement (max 150 words) justifying why your presentation should be selected for inclusion in the program. These submissions will be judged by the Scientific Committee. Submissions receiving a negative decision will be channeled to the other presentation formats as per the authors’ permission.

Symposium

Symposia provide an opportunity for a series of presentations focused on a particular topic. Symposia last 90 minutes and include 6x 15 minute slots. The number and format of the oral presentations within the symposia are decided by its chairs. It can include – for example – four oral presentations, with a discussion and audience engagement activity for the two final slots, or five oral presentations plus a discussion activity. A symposium may not consist exclusively of talks.

The authors should be from at least two different countries, preferably more (the United Kingdom is considered as one country in this regard).

We welcome symposium submissions on any topic of relevance to health psychology, including those focusing specifically on the conference theme.

The symposium convenor must submit the symposium details, a symposium overview abstract, and the timetable indicating the running order of the presentations/activities that comprise the symposium. Following this submission, the abstract submission system will automatically email the authors named in the symposium details as responsible for each oral presentation in the symposium a code for the symposium. These authors should then submit their respective abstracts as per the instructions for oral presentations (see above), but they must use the code that they have received from the system to link their submission to the symposium. Further details are provided below.

Symposium details and overview abstract format:

Title: 15 words or fewer (use upper-case letters only for the first word and names).

Convenor details (name and affiliation): First name(s) followed by surname(s); institution of affiliation, country. There can be up to two convenors, but it is a requirement that one of the convenors is designated as responsible for the symposium.

Chair details (name and affiliation): First name(s) followed by surname(s); institution of affiliation; country. There can be up to two chairs. The chair may be the same person as the convenor or an author of one of the symposium presentations.

Oral presenters (name, affiliation, and email): First name(s) followed by surname(s); institution of affiliation; country; and email address. Please provide one name per presentation only; this should be the person responsible for each oral presentation in the symposium.

Activity coordinator details (if applicable): First name followed by surname; institution of affiliation; country. The activity coordinator will present, lead or chair the activity session if one is featured in the symposium.

Discussant details (if applicable): First name followed by surname; institution of affiliation; country. After the presentations/activities, the discussant (if applicable) provides an overview of the main issues raised in the symposium and facilitates a general discussion of the topic by the audience and the authors.

Symposium overview abstract (maximum 300 words) should include:

Aims: Four or five points that summarise what you expect the symposium to achieve.

Rationale: Explain why it is important to discuss this issue at this year’s conference.

Summary: Outlining the symposium as a whole and integrating the individual contributions.
Please do not include (a list of) references in the body or at the end of your abstract.
Timetable: Indicating the running order of the sections in time slots (prepare as a separate file, to be uploaded in the submission process).
Abstracts for individual symposium oral presentations: Please follow the submission guidelines for an oral presentation about the appropriate format of the abstract.

Please note that the symposium overview abstract and all individual oral presentation abstracts in the symposium must be submitted to the same track.

Roundtable / debate / showcase

Roundtables, debates and showcases are intended as fora for the engagement and discussion of issues, developments and innovations of relevance to Health Psychology by critiquing current evidence and suggesting future directions for research and applications. The session, which lasts 60 minutes, should select a specific topic or issue which is to be the focus of discussion from different perspectives and actively encourage participation by the attending conference delegates; at least 30 minutes should be reserved for audience participation. The contributors to the session should provide concise and coherent summaries of their respective perspectives on the topic/issue sufficient to enable delegates to participate in the session.

Roundtables/ debates/ showcases usually involve brief presentations (max. 6 presentations of max. 5 minutes each) from different presenters (from a minimum of two countries; the United Kingdom is considered as one country in this regard) and are aimed at developing ideas on a topic or showcase a novel technology or intervention. For all three types of sessions, an interactive and structured discussion period is required. The organizers need to present a timetable and a plan for audience engagement and facilitating discussion, e.g., through fishbowl formats or facilitated small-group work.

We welcome roundtable, debate, and showcase submissions on any topic/issue of relevance to health psychology. Submissions could, for instance, focus on how to strengthen the contribution of health psychology to improving population health, possibly with contributors outside health psychology; involving representatives of the patients and the public in all research stages to increase the impact of health psychology research; incorporating health psychology expertise in the teaching and training of health practitioners to facilitate the translation of research evidence into clinical practice; or introducing a novel intervention or measurement technology.

The convener of the roundtable/ debate/ showcase should make the submission, which should include the following details:

Title: 15 words or fewer (use upper-case letters only for the first word and names).

Convener(s) details (name and affiliation): First name(s) followed by surname(s); institution of affiliation, country.

There can be up to two convenors, but it is a requirement that one of the convenors is designated as responsible for the submission. The convenor(s) also serves as the chairperson who takes responsibility for leading the discussion and asking questions.
Contributors’ details (name and affiliation): ): First name(s) followed by surname(s); Institution of affiliation, country.
There should be no more than six contributors.
Roundtable/debate/showcase overview abstract (maximum 400 words) should include:
Purpose: A statement of focus to be addressed by this session.
Objectives: Up to four objectives, summarizing what you expect the discussion to achieve.
Rationale: A rationale for addressing this issue at this conference.
Summary: Outline the context or focus of each contributor’s research/approach.
Please do not include (a list of) references in the body of your abstract or at the end of your abstract.
Timetable: Indicating the running order of the sections (prepare as a separate file, to be uploaded in the submission process) and possible association with a SIG.

POSTER PRESENTATIONS

Poster presentations can be one of two types: (a) Standard poster, (b) Work in progress.

Physical posters: Printed posters will be exhibited at the conference venue in a dedicated time slot. Presenters will be grouped in chaired sessions, where presenters will be asked to briefly present their poster and respond to questions in 3-5 minutes.

a. Abstracts for standard poster presentations should include:
Title: 15 words or fewer (use upper-case letters only for the first word and names).
Author(s) details (name and affiliation): First name(s) followed by surname(s); Institution of affiliation, country. The first author is the presenting author.

The body of the text should be no longer than 250 words and include:

Background: State the primary objectives of the study, including the main research questions, aims or theory being tested.
Methods: Quantitative studies should include design, participants (including number of participants), measures, and analysis. Qualitative studies should include design, participants, and methods of data collection and analysis, e.g., thematic analysis, discourse analysis, and interpretative phenomenological analysis.

Findings: Quantitative studies should include a summary of the results (accompanied by important statistical information). Qualitative studies should include a description of the main findings such as the themes or categories generated. An abstract for work-in-progress should include a detailed description of the planned analyses.

Discussion: Conclusions and/or some discussion of the possible contribution to, or implications for, health psychology, SIG’s activity, and other relevant contexts.
Please do not include (a list of) references in the body or at the end of your abstract.
b. Abstracts for “work in progress” presentations should include:

This type of presentation allows researchers to provide information about, and share their reflections on, work in progress. Although these presentations do not require data collection to be completed, the work still has to be of a demonstrably good scientific quality to be accepted. Consequently, the abstract should have clear and explicit aims and objectives, hypotheses, or research questions; methods should be clearly described, with an explicit statement of intended sample characteristics and justification for this; a clear plan of analysis should be outlined, which should make clear how the intended analyses will address the research aims or research question; and the discussion section should clarify the expected or potential implications of the research.

WORKSHOPS

This category of submission refers to sessions provided before the official opening of the conference.

A workshop provides an opportunity for a group of participants to achieve a specific goal or address a particular problem. It may be designed to train or educate participants in a particular research methodology or theoretical approach, or to address a specific problem, such as how to use research findings in health care or policy. A workshop can also be a useful way to develop a consensus on a particular issue. For example, the goal of the workshop may be to produce a position statement or policy on a given topic, to identify priorities in an area or to develop theoretical perspectives or methodologies. It should have a clear structure and require active participation by everyone involved.

The SYNERGY Board assesses workshop submissions in terms of their overall quality, their attractiveness for health psychologists, the expertise of the facilitators and the activities suggested to attain the workshop objectives. Submission is till March 14th, 2025.

A workshop proposal must be submitted by the convenor and must include the following details:

Title: 15 words or fewer (use upper-case letters only for the first word and names).
Convenor and Facilitator details (name and affiliation): First name(s) followed by surname(s); Institution of affiliation, country.

There can be up to two convenors, but it is a requirement that one of the convenors is designated as responsible for the workshop. Facilitators should be experts in the topic and write a short statement about their expertise in this area.

An indication whether a half-day or full-day workshop is preferred.

Workshop overview abstract (maximum 300 words) should include:

Objectives: up to four objectives, summarizing what you expect the workshop to achieve and issues to be addressed.
Activities: an indication of the activities that will be undertaken during the workshop.
Description of the intended participants.
The maximum number of participants for the workshop.
Conflict of interest: Convenor(s) are required to disclose any potential conflict of interest they may have concerning the content of the proposed workshop (this disclosure is not included in the word limit) and possible association with a SIG.

Please also note that:

Conference workshops should focus on topics that correspond with the conference tracks and should be of broad relevance to health psychology such as methods, scientific writing, intervention techniques and development strategies, evaluation strategies, health behavior theories, implementing health psychology into practice, critical reading, etc. We particularly welcome proposals for workshops related to the conference theme.

Full-day workshops are reimbursed with 500 Euros per workshop (not per facilitator) and half-day workshops are reimbursed with 250 Euros per workshop (not per facilitator) by the EHPS.

Workshops will take place providing a sufficient number of participants apply to ensure the workshop is feasible and financially viable. If only a small number of participants register for a workshop, the EHPS has the right to cancel it up to four weeks ahead of the conference.

ONLINE PARTICIPATION: RECORDED ORAL AND VIRTUAL POSTERS PRESENTATIONS

We encourage participants to submit their research for face-to-face presentation at the conference in Groningen. However, we acknowledge that valid reasons might prevent participants from attending the conference in person. The conference offers the option to present research via pre-recorded oral presentations and/or online posters.

Pre-recorded oral presentations will be grouped in sessions with face-to-face presentations. Online poster presentations will need to be submitted to the conference platform prior to the conference and can be accompanied by a short 3-minute video presentation, which can be viewed anytime during and after the conference on the conference platform. They will not be part of the face-to-face poster sessions on site.

The abstract format for recorded oral presentations and for the posters is the same as for oral presentations, see above.

Submission is OPEN

The submission deadline is set for February 14, 2025